supporting personnel of Houston Independent School District because the District does not
currently employ attorneys who have specialized knowledge and experience regarding
Multi-District Litigation and analysis and legal remedies under both Texas and federal law on
a contingent fee basis. In addition, the District has not budgeted the financial resources
necessary to advance the significant litigation expenses required by this type of litigation nor
to compensate competent and experienced attorneys and staff regarding Multi-District
Litigation as District employees or to reasonably compensate a firm in private practice with the
necessary experience under a contract providing for payment on an hourly basis without
contingency.
Due to the complexity of the matter and expected difficulties in performing the legal work for
this matter, the risk of no recovery, the expected expenses, including expert witness fees and
other litigation costs, a reasonable hourly fee for a firm in private practice to prosecute this
matter would exceed the amount for which the District would be able to adequately budget
and expend financial resources. The District also does not have the financial resources
required to pay the additional, significant costs of implementing appropriate infrastructure and
technology necessary to fully and properly perform the needed legal services. The District
also does not have the financial resources required to properly pursue its claims and causes
of action, including to retain independent experts as testifying witnesses and to finance all
costs of litigation through final resolution of the matter. Additionally, many law firms that
handle large, complex matters strictly on an hourly basis have institutional clients, including
social media corporations, insurance companies, and social media corporations; and it would
be difficult to find a firm with experience in this area that does not have a conflict of interest
that would hinder the firm’s ability to effectively represent the District. The proposed law firms
have certified that they have no such conflict of interest in representing Houston ISD.
The legal services cannot be reasonably obtained from attorneys in private practice charging
hourly fees without contingency because a contract to pay attorneys on an hourly basis
without contingency would represent an additional and significant cost to Houston
Independent School District. Furthermore, the District would be responsible for payment of all
costs and expenses of the litigation through appeals, including to retain independent experts
as testifying witnesses and to finance all discovery expenses and other costs of litigation
through final resolution of the matter. The District does not have the financial resources
necessary to pay for these additional and significant expenses necessitated by this social
media multi-district litigation.
Thompson & Horton, LLP; Eiland & Bonnin, PC; and O’Hanlon, Demerath & Castillo, PC, will
be compensated on a contingent fee basis. Entering into the proposed agreement is in the
best interests of the residents of Harris County, Texas. The District has sustained significant
damages due to youth social media usage and addiction and for which there exists a potential
recovery from the perpetrating social media corporations. Thompson & Horton, LLP; Eiland &
Bonnin, PC; and O’Hanlon, Demerath & Castillo, PC, possess the specialized skills,
knowledge, experience, financial, and technological resources needed to competently and
fully pursue maximum potential recovery of the District's damages. Furthermore, the proposed
agreement enables the District to pursue its legal remedies without diverting essential monies
and resources from the ongoing needs and operations of its students, staff, and community at
large. In addition, the proposed agreement shifts the financial risk and burden of litigation
costs and expenses to Thompson & Horton, LLP; Eiland & Bonnin, PC; and O’Hanlon,
Demerath & Castillo, PC, with the District owing no such monies to the law firms unless and
until it recovers monies. Moreover, Texas statutory and common law provide for penalty